Lipstick on a Pig! by Krista Keating, at Revolutionize Yo' Block 2:19 pm / 10 September 2008
As America was force-fed by the right wing faction and the irresponsible media the erroneous claim that Obama somehow made a sexist remark when he claimed that Palin's policies when applied to McCain's policies would simply be putting "lipstick on a pig" (a saying that McCain himself used when speaking about Hillary Clinton's health care proposals, yet he was never called a sexist) we were and are still suffering from an economic recession in which our politicians will waste away at least 50 million dollars to protect their political pageantry.
In the past few weeks I've seen anarchists bum rush big business and break windows. I've seen poor people and their advocates and activists march for their lives. I've seen people lay their bodies down in front of police horses and bear the burning pepper spray of riotous police. I've seen rappers spit lyrics and punks stomp their boots, all to bring attention to a broken and corrupt system that seems to only benefit the people who already have all the benefits they need.
I've debated in heated and emotionally charged conversations about which candidate best represents the revolutionary movement and the people who fill that social location. I have battled with my conscience, engaging in an internal examination of what it means to revolutionize.
Recently a colleague of mine who had emotionally supported the Green Party ticket, but would be voting for Obama-Biden in November, reversed his decision, surprisingly, believing that it was a question of internal integrity. He simply could not vote for Obama considering what McKinney-Clemente had contributed to the movement. This revelation sent me again into a tail spin about the election. But as our conversation moved forward we agreed that perhaps pushing for the Democratic ticket and getting Obama into the White House, simply just the lesser of two evils, it would allow for the movement to highlight the establishment parties' similarities and push for that third party option.
It is not hyperbole when we say that the Bush Administration has run the United States into the ground. The Republicans have lied, cheated, stole, killed, maimed and spit on the American people to further exclusive personal agendas and fill the pocketbooks of an extremely slim population of affluent individuals. Lying to the American people to send our youth off to die based on outright fabrications is an impeachable offense that makes getting a blow job in the oval office look like stealing candy from your grandmother's cupboard.
However, the Democrats have been complicit in their ignorance of the corruption and instead of exposing the gross abuse of power they instead tried to slyly manipulate and blackmail the administration into filling the Democratic pocket book as well.
While I am still undecided about whom I will pull that lever for in November, the notion of getting a Democrat into the White House so that we can expose that the Democrats are no friend of a revolutionary change, that what Americans need is a third party option not the same tired two-step, sounds more enticing by the moment.
So, I am asking that my fellow revolutionaries consider voting for Obama in November as a strategic political and counter-establishment maneuver. A maneuver that will put the multi-cultural working-class revolutionary movement in a position to present the push for a third party (or even further, for a multi-party) option on future ballots. Obama is not a civil rights leader. He is an establishment candidate. He is the lesser of two evils. Obama is the lipstick on the pig.
In the past few weeks I've seen anarchists bum rush big business and break windows. I've seen poor people and their advocates and activists march for their lives. I've seen people lay their bodies down in front of police horses and bear the burning pepper spray of riotous police. I've seen rappers spit lyrics and punks stomp their boots, all to bring attention to a broken and corrupt system that seems to only benefit the people who already have all the benefits they need.
I've debated in heated and emotionally charged conversations about which candidate best represents the revolutionary movement and the people who fill that social location. I have battled with my conscience, engaging in an internal examination of what it means to revolutionize.
Recently a colleague of mine who had emotionally supported the Green Party ticket, but would be voting for Obama-Biden in November, reversed his decision, surprisingly, believing that it was a question of internal integrity. He simply could not vote for Obama considering what McKinney-Clemente had contributed to the movement. This revelation sent me again into a tail spin about the election. But as our conversation moved forward we agreed that perhaps pushing for the Democratic ticket and getting Obama into the White House, simply just the lesser of two evils, it would allow for the movement to highlight the establishment parties' similarities and push for that third party option.
It is not hyperbole when we say that the Bush Administration has run the United States into the ground. The Republicans have lied, cheated, stole, killed, maimed and spit on the American people to further exclusive personal agendas and fill the pocketbooks of an extremely slim population of affluent individuals. Lying to the American people to send our youth off to die based on outright fabrications is an impeachable offense that makes getting a blow job in the oval office look like stealing candy from your grandmother's cupboard.
However, the Democrats have been complicit in their ignorance of the corruption and instead of exposing the gross abuse of power they instead tried to slyly manipulate and blackmail the administration into filling the Democratic pocket book as well.
While I am still undecided about whom I will pull that lever for in November, the notion of getting a Democrat into the White House so that we can expose that the Democrats are no friend of a revolutionary change, that what Americans need is a third party option not the same tired two-step, sounds more enticing by the moment.
So, I am asking that my fellow revolutionaries consider voting for Obama in November as a strategic political and counter-establishment maneuver. A maneuver that will put the multi-cultural working-class revolutionary movement in a position to present the push for a third party (or even further, for a multi-party) option on future ballots. Obama is not a civil rights leader. He is an establishment candidate. He is the lesser of two evils. Obama is the lipstick on the pig.
